Mercatus Policy Download

Mercatus Center at George Mason University

Looking for smart policy ideas for a growing world? Subscribe to the Mercatus Policy Download for all policy, no punditry, and a path forward. Looking to connect with a scholar you heard on the Download? Email mercatusoutreach@mercatus.gmu.edu. read less
ニュースニュース
政治政治
政治政治

エピソード

Land Use Without Zoning: Putting Ideas into Practice
25-05-2021
Land Use Without Zoning: Putting Ideas into Practice
Welcome to The Bridge Policy Download, produced by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.  Zoning and land use policy regulations present the greatest barriers to affordable housing and increased urban density. Understanding how to navigate and remove these barriers allows for a dynamic housing market and paves the way for successful community development efforts. The study of the impact of land use and zoning policy began with Bernard Siegan in his pioneering 1972 study, "Land Use Without Zoning." In his book, Siegan first set out what has today emerged as a common-sense perspective: Zoning not only fails to achieve its stated ends of ordering urban growth and separating incompatible uses, but it also drives housing costs up and competition down. Drawing on the unique example of Houston—America’s fourth-largest city, and its lone dissenter on zoning—Siegan explored the impact of a different approach to land use policy and demonstrated how land use will naturally regulate itself in a non-zoned environment and yield a greater availability of multifamily housing. While we have gained a greater understanding of the issues created by overly burdensome land use restrictions, these policies still remain in place, restricting the growth of communities and keeping housing costs high. Our speakers discuss how land use reform battles have evolved over time, how community groups are working to remove these barriers and increase urban density, and how barriers to development can be challenged in court. Speakers and Topics • Jim Burling, Pacific Legal Foundation, on legal barriers to development and issues in modern land use policy • Tory Gattis, Center for Opportunity Urbanism, on Houston land use regulation after 1972 and lessons for other cities • Emily Hamilton, Mercatus Center, on the case for pre-emption and current Texas proposals Moderator • Charles Coats, Texans for Housing If you would like to contact a scholar featured in this episode, please email mercatusoutreach@mercatus.gmu.edu. If you would rather watch the video from this webinar, you can find it here.
Digital Platforms: Antitrust or Regulation?
04-05-2021
Digital Platforms: Antitrust or Regulation?
Welcome to the Bridge Policy Download produced by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Today we’re bringing you the audio from a recent webinar we held on Antitrust. Antitrust and other regulatory authorities around the world are busily assessing potential enforcement actions against big digital platforms, including Google, Facebook, and Amazon, among others. The panel addresses the following questions: Should governments establish regulations that sets clear rules of conduct for digital platforms?Can existing “consumer welfare” standards guiding antitrust enforcement effectively curb abuses by digital platforms?Are proposals to heighten antitrust prohibitions and reverse antitrust burdens of proof de facto regulation?   If you’d like to contact a scholar involved in this episode, please email mercatusoutreach@mercatus.gmu.edu. Don Boudreaux, Senior Fellow in the F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics here at Mercatus will be moderating this panel of leading antitrust scholars, regulators, and practitioners to address these timely questions about digital platforms. Meet the panel: Alden Abbott, Senior Research Fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University Scott Hemphill, Moses H. Grossman Professor of Law at New York UniversityJohn Yun, Associate Professor of Law, Scalia Law School at George Mason University Nicolas Petit, Joint Chair in Competition Law at the Robert Schumann Centre for Advanced Studies, European University InstituteAurelien Portuese, Director of Antitrust and Innovation Policy at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
The Best Arguments For and Against Paid Federal Leave
29-12-2020
The Best Arguments For and Against Paid Federal Leave
Welcome to the Bridge Policy Download produced by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Today, we’re bringing you the audio from a recent virtual congressional briefing we held on the best arguments for and against paid federal leave. It is often noted that the United States is the only industrialized country without a federal paid leave program. While true, Dr. Veronique de Rugy points out that this doesn't necessarily mean that women in countries that have such government-mandated programs are doing better than women in the United States. In this Congressional staff briefing, de Rugy weighs in on expected outcomes of various proposed federal paid leave programs, based on a review of research from other countries. She also responds to each point in favor of a federal paid leave program with unanswered questions, the expected impact on women, and unintended consequences. If you’d like to contact a scholar involved in this briefing, please email mercatusoutreach@mercatus.gmu.edu If you'd prefer to watch the video from this virtual briefing, click here.  We've changed our name! What was formally known at the Mercatus Policy Download is now The Bridge Policy Download. Our goal has always been to provide our audience with smart policy ideas for a growing world, and that remains to be our goal. To learn more about The Bridge, visit mercatus.org/bridge. Subscribe to The Bridge Policy Download for all policy, no punditry, and a path forward, wherever you get your podcasts.