I continue my examination of objections to the first premise of the KCA that everything which begins to exist must be caused to exist. The objections I cover in this episode include:
(1) The argument equivocates on the meaning of "begins to exist"
(2) Science cannot support the first premise it only shows that the transformation of matter from one state to another requires a cause - not that the origin of matter itself requires a cause.
(3) We have no experience of things coming into being from nothing to know that they require a cause
Web: ThinkingtoBelieve.com
Email: ThinkingToBelieve@gmail.com
Facebook: facebook.com/thinkingtobelieve
Twitter & Gettr: @thinking2believ
Truth: @ThinkingToBelieve